top of page
UNIAEA_1.jpg

United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency (UNIAEA)

WhatsApp Image 2026-09-20 at 07.37.02.jpeg
Walter Welsh
Committee Director
w.welsh@aiscr.org
WhatsApp Image 2026-09-20 at 07.39.17.jpeg
Gabriela Valerio
Committee Director
gvalerio.theglobalmun@gmail.com
WhatsApp Image 2026-09-20 at 07.39.41.jpeg
Ricardo Javier Mahomar Handal 
Committee Director
r.mahomar.2030@seishn.com

Topics:

"The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster (1986): Emergency Containment, Information Control"

and

"The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster (1986): Transboundary Ecological Crisis Management"

​

Topic Summary: 

Topic A:

On April 26, at 1:23am, the worst disaster in the history of nuclear power generation happened in Prypyat, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. The Vladimir Ilyich Lenin Nuclear Power Plant is a station that consists of 4 units, each regular unit is capable of producing a calculated amount of 1,000 megawatts (MW) of electric power. During testing, several explosions triggered a fireball, blowing off the heavy steel and concrete lid of the reactor. Radioactive material blended in the atmosphere, 49,000 residents of Pripyat, located 3 kilometers away from the plant, are forced to evacuate. Deaths are unknown, and so are the answers to the overwhelming tension from the people; Europe is being flooded by wind-transported radioactivity, after the Swedish monitoring stations reported the abnormality of the occurrence. Meanwhile, the world wonders both the reckless, and deliberate disregard of safety procedures in such dangerous circumstances, and now that the damage has been done, what emergency response will save us all? In this historical UNIAEA, we will discuss the management of the unfolding international crisis. How will we respond to the deaths, radionuclides, inhabitable conditions, and term elements that can persist in air from 300-4.5 billion years? 

​

Topic B:

Three consecutive Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conferences have now concluded without a consensus final document, most recently collapsing in May 2026 over an unresolved dialogue between nuclear-armed states resisting binding disarmament timelines, and non-nuclear states demanding such. The NPT entered into force in 1970 and now counts 191 member states, and since then, has prioritized its three pillars– non proliferation, disarmament, and peaceful use of nuclear energy– to keep the number of nuclear-armed states in single digits. Yet, an underlying truth is putting the whole world at risk– the NPT was built to stop new weapons, not to protect existing nuclear infrastructure.  While countries cannot agree on nuclear security safeguards, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe, Zaporizhzhia, repeatedly faced shelling, drone strikes, and military occupation since March 2022. Delegates in the UNIAEA committee must confront a regime under the pressure of two directions simultaneously: the proliferation risk of states and the expansion of technology, and a newer, less-anticipated risk of nuclear facilities becoming military targets in active, or future conflicts and warfare. Additionally, debate ahead should not settle solemnly on “strengthening NPT”; delegates must decide whether the current safeguard systems are adequate for a world where nuclear sites sit in active frontline, and what obligations–if any– do states have to protect nuclear infrastructure, especially in armed conflicts.

      

AASCAMUN 2027

image_2023-08-30_173959391_edited_edited

©2027 by AASCAMUN 2027. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page